PostHeaderIcon IPCC Accused: No Research Behind 2035 Glacial Melting Claim


The Interngovernmetal Panel on Climate Change is under accusation of shoddy research after using speculation as scientific fact in their famous 2007 report. Clean Skies News looks at the statement on Himalayan glacial melting by 2035 and what this means for global warming and the IPCC.

15 Responses to “IPCC Accused: No Research Behind 2035 Glacial Melting Claim”

  • GabberX1984 says:

    Pauchari has no qualifications in climatology.

    Quote from the report:
    “Intentional deception to mobilize the politicians and the intimidation of millions of people”

  • Niightversionn says:

    More Global Warming News
    How the ipcc invented a new calculus

    A new form of calculus has been invented by the authors of the the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), in order to create the false impression that global warming is accelerating.

    Google How the IPCC invented a new calculus

  • Niightversionn says:

    More Global Warming News
    How the ipcc invented a new calculus

    A new form of calculus has been invented by the authors of the the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), in order to create the false impression that global warming is accelerating.

    Google How the IPCC invented a new calculus

  • DAILEYericCaryUSA says:

    Climate warming is GOOD for the Earth and for Humanity. More crops, trees, birds, fish and plants.

  • Kymimom says:

    To bad Pachauri the inconvenient truth is we don’t care if your in the “Mood”. You have to answer for this flawed Data.

  • leenooi31 says:

    whats next. . . 911 was a inside job?

  • styleomatic says:

    All the IPCC “scientists” should pay back every dime that they were given for their crack research. Criminals, each and every one.
    Where are you now GW supporters?
    Still believe in global warming? Who is the denier now?

  • wrjamescom says:

    No scientist would soil his credibility by participating in any pseudoscience scam run by political hacks. The IPCC has never been an org remotely related to science.

  • drijayakumar says:

    Its really unfortunate. There are so many great scientists working on this topic. This issue, put their reputation in stake.

  • philipp35a says:

    Diese IPCC-Loge hat jede Glaubwürdigkeit verloren,
    da kann bloß noch die Pharma-WHO mithalten.

    Ive just completed Mikes Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keiths to hide the decline. ”
    - Phil Jones, CRU

  • ClimateAware says:

    Humanity needs a change of heart!

    Check out William Tarkovsky’s youtube eco-video The Book of New Creation. . .

  • humorlinks says:

    The IPCC have behaved like a bunch of ill-informed amateurs.

    There is no excuse. Their standpoint is totally unacceptable.

    The IPCC is not the right body to be in charge of the planet’s climate science. We need real scientists who check their work properly.

    The IPCC stands discredited. They obviously can’t do the job, so let them get out and let somebody else in who can.

  • Britlandish says:

    CO2 is not a pollutant – the IPCC make me sick

  • 00RoninSamurai00 says:

    The UN is a corporate oligarchy founded by the international banking establishment and their corporate cronies for the purpose of establishing world domination. The organized criminals behind the UN subvert sovereign nations through their respective central banks, which provides them with the unlimited resources to bribe government officials into surrendering the sovereignties of their respective nations. It is corrupt, should be disbanded, and its leaders should be imprisoned for subversion.

  • MrXstacey says:

    Pachauri should not be conducting an investigation he should be investigated! His only peer review should be done by a jury.

Leave a Reply